RMS Titanic

January 2012, Volume 49 No. 1
A marked difference?

EVER since the first decimal coins appeared, our hobby has lacked a certain something. Modern minting methods and quality control at the huge site in Llantrisant meant that the oddities and rarities that so many of us eagerly sought in our pre-decimal change became few and far between. Our currency became uniform, bland even and despite the Royal Mint’s attempts to introduce new designs, the excitement of finding a true rarity has almost disappeared. After all, even the most limited of the designs, be it on a 50p, £1 or £2 was being struck in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions and a little patience was enough to allow any collector of modern coinage to complete the set—or so we thought. There is no denying that the uniform, high quality coinage, all featuring one monarch, all featuring the correct obverse and reverse, meant that interest in coins amongst the “non-collector” began to wane; with no chance of finding anything different in his pocket the man in the street stopped checking his change and our hobby began to diminish somewhat, as there were fewer people checking their change for rarities so fewer people took their interest to the next level to become full blown numismatists. Those of us who did carry on found ourselves neglecting the post 1971 coins as we felt there was nothing worth looking out for. Then we found out about the 1983 2p and gradually things began to look up for modern coinage. The 1983 2p, for those who don’t know, is worth looking out for because there are a few out there worth far more than 2p. In 1982 the legend on the reverse of the “new coins” was changed from New Pence to whatever the denomination was: One Penny, Two Pence, Five Pence, etc. However, it seems that in 1983 some coins were minted for a promotional pack that used the pre-1982 reverse meaning that you had a 1983-dated coin with New Pence on it—today that rarity fetches £100s and it’s well worth checking your change for that one! Then back in 2009 the papers and internet were full of stories of the “dateless 20p”—another reverse/obverse error that was fetching £100s but has settled down to round about £50. We also hear of the “inverted” die 2008 penny—where the obverse and reverse are “upside down” in relation to each other. No-one knows how many of those might be around but some collectors are prepared to pay serious money for the ones that do surface—again well worth keeping an eye open for. The latest rarities come from the 50p family—the Kew Gardens 50p has a mintage so low (10,000) that they are bound to command a premium when they do finally surface and in the last month or so we hear of a variety within the Olympic 50p programme that has been fetching large sums on-line. The “underwater swimmer” variety of the Aquatics 50p (where the water obscures the swimmer’s face—see “News and Views” this month) was issued in very limited numbers in the first packs and keen collectors are eagerly snapping them up—modern coins are interesting once again.

This being the case I wonder if there is something the Mint might be able to do to stimulate further interest in modern coins and from there our hobby in general? I know their remit isn’t actually to stimulate collecting and help our hobby, they are really just there to produce coin of the realm, but the numerous packs and precious metal coins they sell every year show that they have collectors’ interests at heart too—this being the case I wonder if they might ever produce “limited edition” coins for circulation? I can’t see them putting an error out there on purpose—their pride in their quality control wouldn’t allow that—but maybe a limited number of coins with a special mint mark? A 1,000 of each mintage with the Royal Mint’s own crest somewhere would certainly get people looking wouldn’t it? I’m not suggesting they sell them separately, that would defeat the object, but what if they put them into circulation just like any other coin? It would certainly create an interest. But then again is that what we collectors want? Would we be interested in such a mint-marked coin? A “gimmick” such as that? Or are we only really interested in genuine rarities, the errors? The low mintages that come about because of demand rather than those artificially created? I can see some jumping at the chance of getting their hands on a “special mint-marked” £1, but others might shun such a blatant piece of rarity engineering. I think I’d probably look out for them, if only to sell on (as many others would I am sure). What would you do . . . ?

Order Back Issue

You can order this item as a back issue, simply select a delivery option from the list below and add it to your shopping basket. The price displayed is the cost of the magazine and the delivery combined.

Free Trial Issue
Click Here
RMS Titanic
Free trial issue Subscribe Buy this back issue

In This Issue

Ancients35
Plato’s X on Roman coins
Interpreting a sign in the Universe
Insight39
The Lombards
A glimpse at the coinage of an independent people
Spotlight43
Elephants and castles, etc.
Some provenance marks examined
Interview46
Sound as a pound
A chat with the new man who signs our new £50 notes
Collector’s notebook51
A matter of provenance
The importance of a coin’s pedigree
In focus54
RMS Titanic centenary
Anniversary of a tragic event recalled in coin
Back to basics69
Note for note
Reflections on a theme
Banknote feature73
Modern Scottish commemorative notes
Spotlight on some recent special issues

Regulars

Editor’s Comment2
Coin news & views12
View of the Bay20
Around the World22
New issues coin update24
Royal Mint Bulletin26
Market Scene29
Bookshelf61
Coin of the month63
Price Guide to SOVEREIGNS64
Banknote News71
Price Guide to THE NOTES OF NBS LTD76
New issues banknote update78
YORK FAIR FEATURE80
Letters to the Editor83
Dealer Directory84
Fair and auctions diary86
Societies diary86
Semi-display adverts90
The Web Page92
Classified advertising94
ADVERTISERS INDEX95